The intelligence of machines and the branch of computer science which aims to create it

Artificial Intelligence Journal

Subscribe to Artificial Intelligence Journal: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get Artificial Intelligence Journal: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Artificial Intelligence Authors: Corey Roth, Pat Romanski, Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Kevin Benedict

Article

Oracle's PeopleSoft Takeover Bid Can Go Ahead, Judge Rules

Oracle's PeopleSoft Takeover Bid Can Go Ahead, Judge Rules

Related Links:
  • Oracle Wins
  • A Pox on Oracle and PeopleSoft, Say Two Schools Behind "Kuali"
  • PeopleSoft Quarter Sucks
  • Ellison: Acquisition Strategy "Only Way to Survive"


    Oracle chairman Jeff Henley is triumphant: "This decision puts the onus squarely on the board of PeopleSoft to meet with us," he declared.

    Henley made this statement in response to the release of a 164-page decision by U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker, in which Walker gave his verdict on the antitrust lawsuit filed seven months ago by the US Justice Department and 10 states seeking to block Oracle's would-be "hostile takeover" of rival PeopleSoft. There aren't sufficient grounds to block it, Walker has decided.

    It will now be incumbent on the PeopleSoft board to meet with Oracle and discuss the acceptance by its shareholders of Oracle's offer, Henley believes. 

    The order is stayed for 10 days to allow for a possible appeal, but it was enough to send PeopleSoft stock climbing and seems to bring to end a lawsuit on which Oracle has allegedly spent some $60 million and PeopleSoft even more, some $70 million.

    "Contrary to the characterization of plaintiff's counsel before trial," wrote Judge Walker, "the court found the testimony of the customer witnesses largely unhelpful to plaintiff's effort to define a narrow market."

    "Unsubstantiated customer apprehensions do not substitute for hard evidence," he declared, a reference to the Justice Department's arguments that the planned merger would diminish competition in the market for business software used by companies for such tasks as managing payroll and keeping track of employee records.

    Analysts are calling the decision a major defeat for the government, which warned that the hostile takeover would be bad for business and bad for consumers, who - it argued - would eventually bear the burden of decreased competition.

    "This is great news for all shareholders," a spokesman for the American Shareholders Association, Daniel Clifton, said on hearing of the decision. "I think it should be up to the PeopleSoft shareholders to decide whether this is good for them, and that's exactly what this judge is allowing."


    Related Links:

  • Oracle Wins
  • A Pox on Oracle and PeopleSoft, Say Two Schools Behind "Kuali"
  • PeopleSoft Quarter Sucks
  • Ellison: Acquisition Strategy "Only Way to Survive"
  • More Stories By Oracle News Desk

    Oracle News Desk trawls the world's news information sources and brings you timely updates on Oracle and its ever-expanding enterprise software portfolio, including its entire range of tools for managing business data, supporting business operations, and facilitating collaboration and application development.

    Comments (2) View Comments

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Add your comment
    You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

    In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


    Most Recent Comments
    Expect layoffs!!! 09/10/04 08:23:15 AM EDT

    Oracle seems far more interested in PeopleSoft's customer base than its 11,500-person workforce.

    Who cares 09/10/04 08:20:27 AM EDT

    I work for a company that is in the throws of implementing PeopleSoft. When I first heard of the takeover bid from Oracle I was unhappy. (We would finish the implementation of PeopleSoft only to have to do it again with Oracle.) Now that I know PeopleSoft a little better, I no longer care. As far as I am concerned, PeopleSoft will milk the market for all its worth and provide as little in return as possible. In terms of business practices, predatory pricing is the rule at both Oracle and PeopleSoft. Both companies are basically thieves. Once you're locked in with one of these vendors you will pay ... and pay... and pay.